Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal

2 College of Natural Resource Management, Agriculture and Forestry University, Marin, Sindhuli, Nepal

Abstract

The productivity of spring rice is higher than the main season (summer) rice in Nepal although the production is less. Eliminating the competitive effect of weeds can add to increased crop yield and biomass production. Herbicides, one of the methods of weed control, offer numerous advantages over traditional manual weed control; however, they also have negative effects on the environment, which can be mitigated through the implementation of an integrated weed control approach. A field experiment was carried out at Bateshwor, Dhanusha, Nepal involving different combinations of manual weeding, pretilachlor and bispyribac-sodium to determine their impact on the weed dynamics in spring rice (Cv. Hardinath-1). The most prominent weed flora in the experimental plot comprised of 8 weed species (3 broad-leaf weeds, 3 grasses and 2 sedges). Weeds were most persistent when manual weeding was performed although both weed density and dry weight were highest in Control. Least weed density and dry weight were found when both pretilachlor and bispyribac-sodium were used at 20 days after transplanting. Weed control efficiencies were better in this combination which ultimately resulted in the highest grain yield and the highest BC ratio.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. MoALD. (2023). Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture. 17. [Publisher]
  2. Shrestha S, Shrestha J, Kc M, Paudel K, Dahal B, Mahat J, Ghimire SM, Ghimire P. Performance Of Spring Rice Cultivars Against Planting Methods In Western Terai, Nepal, Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC); 2022; 3(1):23-6. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  3. He G, Wang Z, Cui Z. Managing irrigation water for sustainable rice production in China, Journal of Cleaner Production; 2020 Feb 1; 245:118928. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  4. Mukherjee D. Weed management strategy in rice-a review, Agricultural Reviews; 2006; 27(4):247-57. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  5. Pratap V, Verma SK, Dass A. Weed growth, nutrient removal and yield of direct-seeded rice as influenced by establishment methods and chemical-cum-mechanical weed management practices, Crop Protection; 2023 Jan 1; 163:106100. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  6. Parthipan T, Ravi V, Subramanian E. Integrated weed management practices on growth and yield of direct-seeded lowland rice, Indian Journal of Weed Science; 2013; 45(1): 7–11. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  7. Marahatta S. Weed science research and achievement in Nepal, The Journal of Agriculture and Environment; 2018; 19:118-29. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  8. Jacob G, Menon MV, Abraham CT. Comparative efficacy of new herbicides in direct seeded rice, Journal of tropical Agriculture; 2014 Dec 31; 52(2):174-7. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  9. Singh G, Singh VP, Singh M. Effect of almix and butachlor alone and in combinations on transplanted rice and associated weeds, Indian Journal of Weed Science; 2004; 36(1and2):64-7. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  10. 10.Blackshaw RE, O’Donovan JT, Harker KN, Li X. Beyond herbicides: new approaches to managing weeds. InProceedings of the International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture for Dry Areas 2002 Sep: 305-312). [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  1. Balasubramanian R, Veerabadran V. Herbicidal weed management in lowland rice (Oryza sativa) nursery, Indian Journal of Agronomy; 1998; 43(3):437-40. [Google scholar]
  2. Singh UP, Singh Y, Kumar V. Effect of weed management and cultivars on boro rice (Oryza sativa L.) and weeds, Indian Journal of Weed Science; 2004; 36(1and2):57-9. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  3. Yadav DB, Yadav A, Punia SS. Evaluation of bispyribac-sodium for weed control in transplanted rice, Indian Journal of Weed Science; 2009; 41(1and2):23-7. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  4. Ramalingam SP, Chinnagounder C, Perumal M, Palanisamy MA. Evaluation of new formulation of oxyfluorfen (23.5% EC) for weed control efficacy and bulb yield in onion, American Journal of Plant Sciences; 2013; 4(4): 890-895. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  5. Mani VS, Malla ML, Gautam KC. Weed-killing chemicals in potato cultivation, Indian farming; 197323(1): 17-18. [Google scholar]
  6. Rana SS, Kumar S. Research techniques in agronomy. Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur. 2014; 64. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  7. Smith Jr RJ. Weeds of major economic importance in rice and yield losses due to weed competition. InProceeding of the conference on weed control in Rice 1983 Aug 31 (Vol. 31, pp. 19-36). [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  8. Mondal D, Ghosh A, Bera S, Ghosh R, Bandopadhyay P. Eco-efficacy of pretilachlor 50% EC in transplanted winter rice and its residual effect on lentil, Indian Journal of Weed Science; 2019, 51(3): 220-226. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  9. Ranjit JD, Suwanketnikom R. Response of weeds and yield of dry direct seeded rice to tillage and weed management, Agriculture and Natural Resources; 2005 Jun 30; 39(2):165-73. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  10. Walia US, Walia SS, Sidhu AS, Nayyar S. Bioefficacy of pre-and post-emergence herbicides in direct-seeded rice in Central Punjab, Indian Journal of Weed Science;2012; 44(1): 30-33. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
  11. Mishra MM, Dash R, Mishra M. Weed persistence, crop resistance and phytotonic effects of herbicides in direct-seeded rice, Indian Journal of Weed Science; 2016; 48 (1), 13-16 [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]

 

Citation: Bidhan Bagale*, Rubi Kumari Sah. 2024. Effect of Weed Management Practices on Weeds in Spring Rice in Nepal, Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, 6(1), 1-7.